Language Lessons
by popular request!
(well,
Annie asked me to do this, and she's popular)
Petro's Teach Yourself
Anglo-Saxon
(with a little bit of Latin thrown
in)
(we could go on to do some more Latin afterwards, if anyone's interested)
So,
where to start…?
Inflected Languages
For those who aren't familiar with
the concept, I suppose I should explain what is meant by an inflected
language.
In most (if not all) languages,
including Modern English, there are some inflections, ie changes to the form of a word for grammatical purposes,
eg dog, dog's, dogs' and dogs; goose, goose's, and
geese; say, says, saying, said. However, by and large, grammatical meaning in Modern English
relies heavily on word order. By contrast, in
Latin and Anglo-Saxon inflections are used to carry the grammatical meaning.
An
example:
Modern English: the dog
bites the man
Latin:
canis
hominem mordet
Anglo-Saxon:
se docga bitt thone guman
Modern
English: the
man bites the dog
Latin:
canem
homo mordet
Anglo-Saxon: thone
docgan bitt se guma
So to change the meaning in Latin
and Anglo-Saxon, you change the form of the words
themselves. To change the meaning in Modern
English , you change the order of the words.
In the Latin examples above, the
words can go in any order. In the Anglo-Saxon examples, the word-order is slightly less flexible. In both Latin
and Anglo-Saxon, it doesn't matter whether the man comes first in the sentence or the dog does:who bites whom is
shown by the ending of the words man (guma) and dog (docga), and not by their position in the sentence. However, in Anglo-Saxon the
definite article the (se and thone) must always go immediately in front of its noun, dog or man. Whichever is doing the
biting (ie the subject of the verb to bite), is in the
nominative case (se docga, se guma), and whichever is being bitten
(ie the object of the verb to bite), is in the accusative case (thone docgan, thone guman). More later on the different
cases.
To sum up:
You can put words in almost any order in Latin and the basic meaning will stay the
same (although changing the word-order
in Latin can produce subtle differences of emphasis).
In Anglo-Saxon, word-order is starting to become fixed (especially in prose, but in
poetry it is still much more flexible).
In Modern English, especially in
poetry, you can still play about with word-order to a small extent ("The throstle in the pear tree sings"), but
by and large if you change the word-order, you will change the basic meaning of the
sentence.
With me so far? In which case, you will have gathered that learning Latin and
Anglo-Saxon is largely about learning all the ways in which the form of the words changes in order to convey
grammatical meaning.
Vocabulary
Obviously you will also need to
learn the vocabulary of the two languages. Much of this is
surprisingly easy for a speaker of Modern English, because a huge amount of Modern English is derived either
from Latin or from Anglo-Saxon. As a general rule, Latin (either directly or via Norman French and later
linguistic routes) gives us what might be loosely described as educated or formal vocabulary, and Anglo-Saxon
gives us simple, basic words, and particles of language such as most of the pronouns, the definite and
indefinite articles, and words like when, who, on, in, and, to,
from, etc. Where there are two words in Modern English that mean roughly the same thing, the more
formal word is likely to be derived from Latin, and the simpler word from Anglo-Saxon: thus regal and kingly, amorous and
loving, amicable and friendly,
equine and horsy, sorority and sisterhood, agriculture and
farming, century and hundred
years, and so on.
A huge number of the Latin words
that you will come across are still around in Modern English in some form or another. By contrast, much Anglo-Saxon vocabulary has fallen out of
use and been lost to the language. These days we
generally no longer need more than one word each for things like blood, spear,
shield, sword and overlord, but, with their very
different cultural preoccupations, the Anglo-Saxons needed rather more (just like the Inuit reputedly having 28
different words for snow).
Latin words are easy to relate to
their Modern English equivalents, because they use more or less the same alphabet. By contrast, Anglo-Saxon looks more difficult on the page,
because it has its own alphabet (or, strictly speaking, not an alphabet at all, but a futhorc). However,
once you know which Anglo-Saxon letters correspond to which letters in Modern English, all becomes much clearer,
and you will find that you can recognise a large number of the words.
The Futhorc
This is the runic "alphabet" and
is so called because the first six letters, feoh, ur, thorn, os, rad and cen, represent the sounds F, U, TH, O,
R and K. There are many runic futhorcs. They are all slightly different, and in fact most of them are actually
futharcs, since, unlike the Anglo-Saxon version, they begin f,u,th,a,r,c). They are found mainly inscribed upon
precious objects, for reasons that are not entirely clear, but almost certainly involve some sort of ritual or
magic element. Rune means secret, and it is likely that the writing of runes was confined to a
very small, probably priestly class.
Most modern printed
Anglo-Saxon texts use runic letters only when there is no Modern English equivalent, but sadly these texts are
not always consistent. Many early ones use
the runic letter wyn (meaning joy), which looks like a pointy letter p; others use the letter w
instead. I can see no reason to use wyn at
all, since w is available in Modern English.
All the printed texts that I
know represent the two th sounds ("voiced" as in then, "unvoiced" as in thick) by using the
runic letter thorn (þ),and the letter bar-d, also known
as eth (ð).
Finally there is
æsc, pronounced ash, and meaning ashtree. This is written as æ, and represents the a sound
in cat, and there is also a long æsc, written ǽ, and representing the a sound in
stare. Anglo-Saxon manuscripts don't
distinguish between long and short æsc (or any other short and long vowels), but most modern printed texts
do.
Once you transliterate wyn, thorn,
bar-d/eth and æ to w, th and a, Anglo-Saxon becomes a lot
easier to read: for example, what looks like
piþor pið suddenly becomes with,
and ðæt becomes that. If you also remember that sc in
Anglo-Saxon is pronounced sh, then words like scip are immediately recognisable (and you can see why
æsc is
pronounced ash).
(In Anglo-Saxon manuscripts and in
some older printed texts and grammars (notably Brunner and Wardale) you will also find the letter yog, which
looks like a long-tailed z, and is pronounced yuh. Almost everyone now uses g for both yog and g, and the yog
symbol has fallen out of use - but if you do see it, now you'll know what it is).
Bits to learn
There's no getting round some
learning-by-heart, so here's the first "paradigm" as they are called, ie the list of all the forms of a
particular word, in this case the first person pronoun:
Latin Anglo-Saxon
Modern English
singular
ego
ich
I
me
me
me
mei
min
mine
mihi
me
to/for me
me
me
by/with/from me
dual
wit
we two
unc
us two
uncer
belonging to us two
unc
to/for/by/with/from us two
plural
nos
we
we
nos
us
us
nostrum
ure
ours
nobis
us
to/for/by/with/from us
---o0o---
31st October 2009
With a broken arm, it's going to be a
while before I can post any more Language Lessons - I just can't type and manage the reference books
one-handed! But here is something to be going
on with that may be of interest:
The Anglo-Saxon Year
Anglo-Saxon Meaning
Modern English
Æftera-Geol-Monaþ After
Yule Month January
Sol-Monaþ Sun
Month February
(the month when the sun returns)
Hreð-Monaþ Month
of Victory March
Eostur-Monaþ Month
of Eostre
(the dawn goddess) April
Ðrimilce-Monaþ Month
of Three Milkings May
(when
the grass was so good that cows
could
be milked three times a day)
Ærra-Liða-Monaþ First
Sailing Month June
Æftera-Liða-Monaþ Second
Sailing Month July
Weod-Monaþ Month
of Weeds August
Halig-Monaþ Holy
Month September
Winter-Fylleð Winter
Full Moon October
(monaþ-fyllen
= time of the full moon)
Blot-Monaþ Blood
Month November
(perhaps
so called because it is when surplus
livestock
would be slaughtered before winter)
Ærra-Geol-Monaþ Before
Yule Month December
Modra-Niht Mother's
Night Winter
Solstice
(because
it is the night of the birth of the New Year)
If any of these sound familiar, you're probably a Tolkein fan. He bases the Shire
calendar largely on the Anglo-Saxon calendar as recorded by the Venerable Bede.
|